Connecticut Supreme Court Allows Damage Suit Against Marsh to Proceed

 

Connecticut’s Attorney General Richard Blumenthal can attempt to recover damages from Marsh & McLennan Inc. for harming the economy of the entire state, the state's Supreme Court ruled last week. The ruling stems from a still-pending 2005 suit against Marsh that alleges the mega-brokerage rigged bids and colluded with insurers in a “pay to play” scheme in which it set prices for commercial insurance in the state.

Connecticut is one of only a handful of states that allows regulators to seek damages for anti-competitive business practices that harm generally the economy of the state. Blumenthal contends that Marsh's unfair business practices raised the prices of insurance for all consumers and harmed both policyholders and non-policyholders.

CT Supreme Court Allows State Damages Suit Against Marsh (Insurance Journal 4/10/08)

April 15, 2008

 

Rest in Peace: Agents Move On From Contingent Commission Controversy

NY Supreme Court Rules State Can Mandate Compensation Disclosure

NY DOI to Meet Again This Week With PIA of New York On Disclosure Draft

Marsh’s Main Brokerage to Forego Some, Not All, Contingents

Patricia A. Borowski
Sr. VP, Government/Regulatory Affairs
patbo@pianet.org
(703) 518-1360

Mike Becker
Assistant Vice President, Federal Affairs
mikebe@pianet.org 
(703) 518-1365